Watch: Protester says men can have abortions, challenges science & biology
0 (0)

In a viral Youtube video, a passionate protester has made a revolutionary statement – claiming both men and women have the capacity to have abortions – in a bold challenge to the scientific and biological norm. From the nation’s capital, the individual passionately argued that abortion should be available to all genders, sparking an ongoing debate on the boundaries of modern gender roles.
Watch: Protester says men can have abortions, challenges science & biology

Table of Contents

1. Pushback against Biology: A Case for Men’s Abortions

Men have long been told that when it comes to reproduction, they have no say. That choice is neither ceremoniously given nor theirs to take. But what happens when the man wants to take that choice? Shouldn’t men have the right to decide whether or not to abort a fetus, just as women do? This question has become a pressing one and some advocates are pushing for change.

The notion of abortion is largely linked to the bodily autonomy of women, allowing them to make autonomous decisions about their pregnancy. This has not been so for men, though, who have no legal standing in abortion issues. So far, their biological role has been used as an argument to deny them the decision-making power that women have.

This injustice has led to a pushback against the traditional view of reproductive rights and the power dynamics it involves. Men’s groups such as Men Having Abortions have been established to fight for the right of men to choose what happens to a fetus that they helped create. This could mean allowing men to choose how much involvement they have in the decision-making process, or even to give them the right to abort a fetus, too.

  • More research needs to be done into the idea of men’s abortions.
  • A better understanding of the power relations in reproductive rights is necessary.
  • Advocacy from male-oriented organizations has been an important force in pushing for change.

1. Pushback against Biology: A Case for Men's Abortions

2. Dismantling Scientific Orthodoxy: A Look at Men’s Abortion Rights

The concept of supporting men’s right to abortion is still considered a controversial notion.

The argument treats the subject in terms of who should have a say in the decision of whether to terminate a pregnancy, and its askance looks may be attributed to the scientific orthodoxy which has stifled the conversation. This orthodoxy includes practices such as the paternalistic attitudes of medical personnel, decisions taken away from the mother and her partner, and the male-dominated status quo. With its roots in cultural norms and values, this science has resulted in an ethos in which the man’s rights are rarely discussed or considered.

However, when we take a closer look, we realise that this scientific orthodoxy entrapping men goes beyond mere gender roles, or even the law. Men, just like women, are subject to physiological, psychological, and emotional changes which can have a deep impact on the abortion process. A change in circumstances with regard to the decision may cause financial duress, a sense of betrayal, or even a sense of pride in the father. With such varied reactions, it stands to reason that the opinions of men should be given a place in the discussion.

  • The Paternalistic Attitude – Often, the opinions of the male partner are dismissed by medical professionals, which results in a sense of helplessness and exclusion from the process.
  • Decision Making – Both the mother and her partner have a rightful stake in decisions related to the pregnancy.
  • Unique Experiences – Men experience unique feelings of helplessness, financial pressure, guilt, etc. which should be considered in the decision.

3. Challenging Assumptions Around Reproductive Health: Reframing Abortion as a Fundamental Right

Unfortunately, discussions around reproductive health are still met with many taboos and shame. It’s time to move beyond these assumptions, reframing abortion as a fundamental right and expanding the conversation to include access for all. Here are three reasons why.

  • Everyone should have the right to choose: No one should be denied access to reproductive healthcare, regardless of gender, background, ethnicity, or other factors. This is the foundation of a truly equal society.
  • Equality of access beyond the law: The law doesn’t always guarantee access to everyone. Abortion access should be universal, regardless of resources, or geographic location.
  • An important step towards a more equitable world: By acknowledging abortion as a fundamental right, we can create a space in which all people have the same access to medical services, free from stigmatization and judgement.

Therefore, to move beyond the outdated and harmful assumptions around reproductive health, it is necessary to reframe abortion as a legal and fundamental right — one that every person should have the opportunity to exercise without fear or backlash.

4. Expansion of the Representation of Bodily Autonomy: Dismantling Patriarchal Naturalization of Our Bodies

Bodily autonomy is a universal concept that affirms the right of individuals to make decisions about their bodies without fear or intervention from external authority. In recent years, discussions of bodily autonomy have shifted and broadened significantly to include a greater representation of communities and bodies that have historically been denied access to both the political and legal realms. In particular, the movement to dismantle the patriarchal naturalization of our bodies is especially critical in the global struggle for body justice and social transformation.

At its core, the concept of patriarchal naturalization seeks to normalize oppressive forces that regulate and control our bodies. This form of oppression re-inscribes notions of gender essentialism and reinforces the notion of the female body as the “other.” This oppressive belief system, if left unchecked, robs individuals of their bodily autonomy and reinforces systems of privilege or power disparities.

Therefore, it is essential for individuals to re-imagine the notion of bodily autonomy and work to challenge and dismantle oppressive systems that are rooted in patriarchal naturalization. This means actively engaging in dialogue and engaging in meaningful conversations about gender identity, sex, and bodily autonomy. It also means cultivating an awareness of the disparate power dynamics that reinforce the oppression of certain bodies and challenging them on a daily basis. By actively rejecting patriarchal systems and understanding the power of bodily autonomy, we can move towards a more equitable and just future.

  • Challenge oppressive systems
  • Engage in meaningful dialogs
  • Cultivate an awarenees of power dynamics


Q: What are people saying about the video of the protester?
A: Many people have been expressing their views on the video of the protester who challenged science and biology in asserting that men can have abortions. Some agree with the protester and believe that no one should be excluded from the right to choose about their reproductive rights. Others disagree with the protester and have emphasized that abortions—even for gender neutral rights—must take into account scientific and biological facts.

Q: What is the protester advocating for?
A: The protester is advocating for what they call a “gender-neutral” approach to reproductive rights and abortion access without regards to gender. They believe that everyone should have a right to choose over their reproductive decisions and that should not be a gender-specific right.

Q: Does the protester believe that men can have abortions?
A: Yes, the protester does believe that men can have abortions. They believe that no one should be excluded from the right to choose about their reproductive rights and that all should be treated equally when it comes to abortion access.

Q: Do most people agree with the protester?
A: No, not everyone agrees with the protester. People have been expressing differing opinions on the video, and many do not agree with the protester’s assertion that men can have abortions. They have argued that, while everyone should have a right to choose over their reproductive decisions, this should have to take into account scientific and biological facts.

At the end of this discussion, there is no real winner, only a more aware public. It is clear that both sides have different interpretations and understandings of science and biology when it comes to abortion and men. One thing, however, is certain: the importance of more education in these areas needs to be taken seriously. It is clear that more information and understanding is needed in this debate, and that it will continue for some time.

Konuyu Oylamak İçin Tıklayın.
[Toplam Oy: 0 Ortalama Oy: 0]


Bir yanıt yazın

E-posta adresiniz yayınlanmayacak. Gerekli alanlar * ile işaretlenmişlerdir